Nikon
Z 14-24mm F2.8 S
around $2399

Nikon
around $2399
222 Pros
71%
21 reviews (3h 56m)
89 Cons
Pro ultra-wide zoom for Z-mount, corner-to-corner sharpness....
66%
76 vs 39
78%
40 vs 11
78%
25 vs 7
53%
8 vs 7
45%
14 vs 17
Across 21 YouTube reviews, the Nikon Z 14-24mm F2.8 S earns an Index score of 3.9/5, ranking #20 among Lenses. Reviewers most often praise its build quality, image quality, other, while the most common criticisms concern build quality, value for money.
Reviewers herald this lens for its exceptional, edge-to-edge sharpness, excellent contrast, and well-controlled aberrations, delivering professional-grade image quality. It's significantly smaller and lighter than its DSLR predecessor, making it much more portable without sacrificing its robust, weather-sealed build. A major upgrade is the versatile new filter system, which includes a special hood for large 112mm screw-on filters and a rear slot for gels. Combined with fast, silent autofocus and stellar control over flare and coma, it stands out as a fantastic, no-compromise tool for demanding genres like landscape, architecture, and astrophotography, perfectly completing Nikon's professional S-line trinity of zooms.
The most significant drawback is the lens's filter implementation. While the ability to use front filters is a welcome upgrade, the required 112mm size makes them large, expensive, and cumbersome to carry, detracting from the lens's portability gains. Its high price tag is another major consideration, positioning it as a substantial investment aimed squarely at professionals. While smaller than its predecessor, it remains a bulky optic, especially with the filter hood attached. Minor complaints include the lack of in-lens stabilization and less defined sun stars compared to some competitors.
Analysis based on 21 YouTube reviews (3h 56m of video) with 222 pros and 89 cons extracted.
Based on 21 independent YouTube reviews, the Nikon Z 14-24mm F2.8 S scores 3.9/5 with 222 positive and 89 negative points mentioned by reviewers, placing it #20 in the Lenses category.
The most praised aspects are build quality, image quality, other — Build Quality (76 mentions), Image Quality (40 mentions), Other (29 mentions).
Reviewers most frequently criticize build quality, value for money — Build Quality (39 mentions), Value for Money (17 mentions).
Spotted an error? Help me improve by reporting it!
Find this helpful? Please consider a donation!
☕Buy me a coffee