Garmin
Forerunner 165
around $249

Garmin
around $249
337 Pros
74%
19 reviews (3h 15m)
121 Cons
The Garmin Forerunner 165 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker designed specifically for runners who prioritize core functionality and a vibrant display. Its stunning AMOLED touchscreen, a standout feature in this price range, offers crisp readability even in bright sunlight, making checking stats a breeze. The watch excels at handling the fundam...
78%
134 vs 37
71%
40 vs 16
44%
18 vs 23
67%
33 vs 16
88%
29 vs 4
Across 19 YouTube reviews, the Garmin Forerunner 165 earns an Index score of 3.9/5, ranking #27 among Fitness Trackers. Reviewers most often praise its features, design/style, accuracy, while the most common criticisms concern features, battery life.
The Forerunner 165 is widely praised for packing a runner-focused feature set into a compact, lightweight watch, with many reviewers (87 pro mentions across 19 reviews) highlighting running training tools, music storage/control on the music model, comprehensive health tracking (heart rate, sleep, HRV, SpO2), and Garmin coaching/daily workout suggestions. Reviewers also commonly compliment the vibrant 1.2-inch AMOLED display and touch interface (31 mentions) and the comfortable, unobtrusive wearability and bands that make it easy to use day and night (27 mentions). Battery life and long-term endurance are frequently noted positively (16 mentions), and several reviewers call the watch a strong value option for runners because it brings premium features to a lower-priced Forerunner (13 mentions). Many also praise Garmin’s app ecosystem and generally accurate GPS and heart rate data in typical use (9 and 18 mentions respectively).
Criticisms focus on missing higher-end sensors and specialized features: many reviewers (37 con mentions) point out the watch uses an older heart rate sensor generation and lacks multisport/triathlon, multiband GPS, and some advanced training/load metrics found on pricier models. Battery life is a recurring downside for some reviewers (23 mentions), especially when using the always-on display, GPS, or continuous SpO2, and several people say real-world endurance can be noticeably less than headline figures. A smaller group raise concerns about reflectivity and readibility of the AMOLED in some lighting and the use of lower-cost materials (design and durability: 16 and 7 mentions), while a few note occasional accuracy or software oddities in specific activities and the limitations of the app ecosystem for certain advanced users (accuracy, app, and ease-of-use complaints).
Analysis based on 19 YouTube reviews (3h 15m of video) with 337 pros and 121 cons extracted.
Based on 19 independent YouTube reviews, the Garmin Forerunner 165 scores 3.9/5 with 337 positive and 121 negative points mentioned by reviewers, placing it #27 in the Fitness Trackers category.
The most praised aspects are features, design/style, accuracy — Features (134 mentions), Design/Style (40 mentions), Accuracy (33 mentions).
Reviewers most frequently criticize features, battery life — Features (37 mentions), Battery Life (23 mentions).
Spotted an error? Help me improve by reporting it!
Find this helpful? Please consider a donation!
☕Buy me a coffee